Fifteen years of client results, zero AI presence. When a Fortune 500 buyer asks ChatGPT "best supply chain consulting firms," your firm isn't in the answer. We fix that. Documented 3% to 51% citation lift in 90 days.
50-100 prompts · 6 engines · Day 0/30/60/90 proof cycles · 5-day audit turnaround
Your firm has decades of results. But AI engines can't cite what isn't indexable.
Enterprise buyers and procurement teams now use ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini to research consulting firms, law practices, and advisory services before reaching out. If your firm isn't cited in these answers, you're eliminated before the RFP stage. 79% of B2B buyers use AI search during vendor evaluation.
Your best proof of expertise lives in client engagements that can't be published. AI engines default to citing whoever has public, indexable content — not necessarily the best firm. The confidentiality problem is structural, but the solution is methodological: named frameworks, anonymized case patterns, and metric-rich thought leadership that proves expertise without exposing clients.
When your firm has a named implementation methodology, framework, or approach (like our client's CITAble Framework), AI engines treat it as a proper noun worth citing. But if that methodology exists only in slide decks and proposals — not public, indexable pages — the engine has nothing to reference. Published methodology content is among the highest-ROI GEO activities for professional services.
Professional services firms often have strong NAP (name, address, phone) consistency but weak entity signals for AI. Entity SEO — the structured data, directory profiles, and off-site corroboration that tells AI engines "this firm is a real, authoritative entity in its field" — is the foundation. Without it, even great content goes uncited.
62 prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Copilot. Re-tested at Day 0, 30, 60, and 90. Fifteen years of results, zero AI presence — until we built it.
Only 2 of 62 buyer prompts produced any brand citation. Strong offline reputation, Fortune 500 clients, named methodology — entirely invisible to AI. Zero first-person entity presence in synthesized answers.
Entity establishment, ProfessionalService schema, NAP consistency fixed. Four methodology posts published (no client names). Early Perplexity (5 prompts) and Gemini (3 prompts) movement.
Authority layer active. Two trade publication bylines with specific metrics. G2 and Clutch profiles activated with verified reviews. First off-site corroboration signals. Claude and early ChatGPT appearing.
32 of 62 priority prompts now produce direct brand citations. Multi-engine consistency. 180%+ AI referral traffic lift. 18% of closed-won deals citing AI discovery. Named methodology recognized as a proper noun across engines.
Four phases. Every result tracked. Your expertise, made citable.
We test 50-100 buyer and methodology prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Copilot. You get a full gap map showing where your firm is cited, where competitors appear instead, and your highest-leverage opportunities. Includes entity health assessment and named methodology visibility audit. Delivered in 5 business days.
We build the indexable foundation AI engines need: ProfessionalService schema with Person founder entity, named methodology breakdown posts (no client names, full technical depth), metric-rich thought leadership, and NAP consistency across directories. This transforms decades of offline credibility into AI-citable signals.
AI engines verify expertise through independent sources. We develop trade publication bylines with specific metrics, activate G2/Clutch profiles with verified reviews, publish speaking engagement transcripts as indexable posts, and build the entity footprint that makes your firm the obvious AI citation for your category.
We re-run the locked prompt matrix at Day 30, 60, and 90. You see exactly how many additional prompts cite your firm, which methodologies are being recognized, and where competitors are losing ground. Monthly reporting with transparent metrics and pipeline attribution analysis.
50-100 buyer and methodology prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and 3 more engines. Prioritized 60-90 day roadmap in 5 business days. See exactly where your firm is cited — and where competitors are winning. No credit card. No sales call.
We start with the $0 audit. Retainers from $2,500/month after we demonstrate value. 3-month minimum recommended for full Day 0-90 proof cycle.
Initial citation audit delivered in 5 business days. First signals appear on Perplexity and Gemini within 30 days. Our strategy consulting client moved from 3% to 31% by day 60 and 51% by day 90 across 62 buyer prompts on 6 engines. AI referral traffic showed 180%+ lift within the 90-day window with 18% of closed-won deals citing AI discovery.
We use approximate metrics, anonymized industry context (e.g., "2,400-SKU distribution operation"), and heavily emphasized named methodologies. Published content contains zero client names yet still produces direct AI citations because the approach is specific and indexable. AI engines treat properly named methodologies as proper nouns worth citing.
This is the most common starting point. Strong offline reputation with zero indexable proof creates a citation gap that our Day 0-90 methodology is designed to close. Entity establishment, named methodology content, trade publication bylines, and directory/profile activation translate decades of offline credibility into AI-citable signals within 90 days.
All six engines matter but for different reasons. Perplexity and Gemini are typically the first to pick up new entity signals. Claude favors substantive on-domain methodology content. ChatGPT requires the strongest authority layer and is the highest-value target for consulting buyers. We track all six with per-engine citation position and share-of-voice reporting.
It helps dramatically, but it's not required. Named methodologies are citation magnets because AI engines treat them as proper nouns — unique, citable, and specific. If your firm doesn't have a named methodology, we help identify and formalize your proprietary approach as part of the engagement. Even without one, metric-rich case patterns and thought leadership produce strong citation results.
We recommend a 3-month minimum for retained engagements to complete the full Day 0/30/60/90 proof cycle. The free citation audit has zero commitment — we want you to see your current citation data before making any decision. One-time entity establishment or content architecture projects are available after the audit.